|
The following article is based
on the results of our most recent air war survey.
Poll: 110th will get more done
November
15, 2006
Democrats’ overwhelming midterm
election victory last week has
given a majority of people
involved in politics a sense of
hope that the new Congress will
accomplish more than its
predecessor has, according to a
study conducted by Wilson
Research Strategies for The
Hill.
Fifty-one percent overall and 61
percent of independents believe
the 110th Congress will be more
productive than the 109th, which
has been labeled a “do-nothing”
Congress by some experts despite
its majorities in both houses
and control of the presidency.
The 831 respondents, comprised
of individuals who work within
the political arena, also
thought by a 51-34 margin that
the new Congress would “pass
substantive legislation.” But
less than 50 percent thought
presumptive House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi (D-Calif.) would run a
less partisan House than Speaker
Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.), and
nearly equal numbers of people
expect more gridlock as expect
more compromise.
Nearly half expect President
Bush to exercise between five
and 14 vetoes over the next two
years, while 23 percent think
the number will be higher.
About a quarter of respondents
thought the new Congress would
be less productive, while 21
percent saw it producing “about
the same” results. Republicans
expressed far less confidence in
the Democratic leadership, with
only nine percent expecting more
and 62 percent expecting less.
Three-fourths of Republicans
foresaw more partisanship under
Pelosi, while only eight percent
expected less.
“One thing that is really clear
amongst our respondents is an
intense polarization on every
single issue,” said Chris
Wilson, CEO of Wilson Research
Strategies. “You still see the
sort of polarization and intense
partisanship between the two
parties that existed going into
the election; you just have a
different group in power now.”
Republicans, Democrats and
independents were all similarly
surprised by how big the shift
in power was, with at least
two-thirds of each group saying
the Democrats gained more seats
than the respondents thought
they would.
They felt voter fatigue over war
and fiscal irresponsibility had
stronger impacts than corruption
and the Mark Foley scandal,
though at least 89 percent
agreed that all four had some
impact. Forty-three percent of
Republicans said a disengaged
Republican base had a strong
impact on the results on the
election, and another 43 percent
said it had some impact.
Republican respondents blamed
congressional Republicans more
than President Bush for the
losses, while Democrats and
independents both said Bush and
the White House should bear more
blame. Republicans blamed
lawmakers more, by a 60-30
margin, while Democrats blamed
Bush more, by a 73-19 margin.
There was also stark partisan
contrast when people were asked
who they think will be each
party’s 2008 presidential
nominee.
Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.)
and John McCain (R-Ariz.) were,
as in most other surveys, the
clear frontrunners. But the
partisan breakdown reveals
Clinton drawing disproportionate
votes from Republicans and
independents and McCain
receiving disproportionate votes
from Democrats.
Clinton was the 2008 Democratic
nominee in the minds of 71
percent of Republicans and 45
percent of independents, but
only 30 percent of Democrats
(she was still the top
vote-getter among members of her
own party). Similarly, 63
percent of Democrats said McCain
would win the Republican
nomination, while less than 40
percent of Republicans thought
so.
At 48 percent overall, Clinton
finished ahead of Sen. Barack
Obama (D-Ill.) and former Sen.
John Edwards (D-N.C.), who both
received about 15 percent.
McCain’s 51 percent bested
Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney
at 18 percent and former New
York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani
at 13 percent.
Click here
for the complete survey results.
Working with The Hill for
its Air War feature, Wilson
Research Strategies e-mails
campaign or issue ads to survey
participants who view the ads
and rate their effectiveness on
several criteria. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|