
Corzine, Dodd TV ads score below average Chris Christie, Jon Corzine, Chris Dodd
Christie's Corruption-fighting Scores on TV Chris Christie, Charlie Crist, DSCC, Marco Rubio, Health Justice, Terry McAuliffe
Air Wars Analysis March 26-31, 2009 Barack Obama, Jim Tedisco, Scott Murphy, Card Check, Harry Reid
Early GOP ad on stimulus uninspiring Harry Reid, America's Power, Chamber of Commerce, Reality Coalition, American Rights At Work
Hastings Wyman, Southern Political Report 'Grits' James Inhofe (R-OK), Tom Feeney (R-FL)
Air Wars Analysis September 29 - October 30, 2008 John McCain, Barack Obama, Tom Feeney (R FL), Tim Bee (R AZ), Chris Shays (R CT), Gabrielle Giffords (D AZ)
Air War: Feeney’s mea culpa ad scores, honestly John McCain, Barack Obama, Tom Feeney (R FL), Tim Bee (R AZ), Chris Shays (R CT), Gabrielle Giffords (D AZ)
Air Wars Analysis September 17, 2008 McCain, Palin, Obama, Dole (R-NC), Fimian (R-VA)
The Air War: "Coleman's shot at Franken's 'juicy porn' not quite a bull's-eye" Barack Obama, John McCain, Ronnie Musgrove, Norm Coleman, Al Franken
The Hill: Air War: MoveOns Not Alex ad scores big with independents MoveOn.org, Obama, McCain, Gordon Smith, Harri Anne Smith
Air Wars Analysis July 17, 2008 John McCain, Barrack Obama, Harri Anne Smith (R-AL), Gordon Smith (R-OR)
The Airwar: Warner keeps it going with first ad offering Warner (D-VA), Dole (R-NC), Sununu (R-NH)
Air Wars Analysis, June 18, 2008 RNC, Sununu, NRSC, Warner, MoveOn.org
Air Wars Analysis, June 3, 2008 Barack Obama (D), John McCain (R), Bob Schaffer (R-CO), Mark Udall (D-CO), Jay Love (R-AL)
04-16-08 President Barack Obama (D), John McCain (R)
11-18-07 President Edwards(D), Clinton(D), Thompson(R), Paul(R)
03-18-08 ‘3 a.m.’ ad unconvincing Clinton
10-23-07 President Obama(D), Clinton (D), McCain (R), Richardson (D), Romney (R)
9-21-07 President Thompson (R)
8-22-07 The Best and Worst Campaign Ads of 2006 (Winning Campaigns)
8-15-07 President Anti-Huckabee LA Gov Jindal (R), Boasso (D) MS Gov Eaves (D)
7-24-07 President Obama (D), Edwards (D) KS 02 Anti-Jenkins DCCC Veterans Ad
6-28-07 President Richardson (D), Kucinich (D), Dodd (D), Clinton (D)
5-30-07 President Richardson (D), Anti-Bush (D), Dodd (D), Thompson (R)
5-17-07 President Edwards (D), Richardson (D), Giuliani (R)
4-25-07 President Anti-Clinton (D)
3-7-07 President Romney (R), Hunter (R)
2-16-07 President Obama (D), McCain (R)
11-16-06 110th Congress
11-7-06 MD Senate Cardin (D), Steele (R)
10-25-06 NY CD 26 Davis (D), Reynolds (R)
10-12-06 TX CD 17 Edwards (D), Taylor (R)
10-5-06 NY CD 20 Gillibrand (D), Sweeney (R)
9-14-06 MO Senate McCaskill (D), Talent (R)
7-27-06 CT Senate Lamont (D), Lieberman (I)
6-29-06 IA Gubernatorial Culver (D), Nussle (R)
6-15-06 AZ Senate Pederson (D), Kyl (R)
5-18-06 CA CD 50 Busby (D), Bilbray (R)
5-4-06 PA Gubernatorial Swann (R)
4-19-06 Abramoff
3-30-06 MI Gubernatorial DeVos (R)
|
|
 |
Wilson Research Strategies and The Hill Ad Review - Blog
Archive for the ‘Barack Obama’ Category
Wednesday, September 1st, 2010
As widely reported, Republicans have taken an “unprecedented” 10-point lead in the generic congressional ballot. With President Obama’s approval rating upside down and Congressional Democrats job rating taking a plunge, their message of a “Summer of Recovery” has failed. One only has to look at Gallup’s consumer spending charts (below) and the consumer confidence index to see why the Democrat message has fallen flat.
by Dennis Jacobe, Chief Economist, Gallup
PRINCETON, NJ — Americans’ self-reported spending in stores, restaurants, gas stations, and online averaged $61 per day during the week ending Aug. 29. So far, August and back-to-school 2010 spending trends appear no better than those of August 2009.

Posted in 2010 Elections, Barack Obama, Congressional, polling | No Comments »
Monday, August 30th, 2010
Pundits are laughing at Biden’s latest quote about the upcoming election, but I think we should pay more attention to the idea behind it:
The reports of the death of the Democratic Party have been greatly exaggerated. The day after the election there will be a Democratic majority in the House and a Democratic majority in the Senate. If it wasn’t illegal, I would make book on it.
Gallup points out that Republicans are much more enthusiastic, hold a 3-point lead on the generic ballot, and the Presidential approval rating is below 50%, all indicative of double-digit loses for Democrats in November.
While Biden may be overstating the Democrats’ strength, it is important that Republicans realize that this election is not yet “in the bag.” Voters are clearly upset with Obama and Democrats, but recent polling suggests (pdf) that voters hold a very negative opinion of the Republican Party - worse than what they think about the Democratic Party.
Democratic Party
Positive  32%
Neutral 22%
Negative 44%
Republican Party
Positive 24%
Neutral 28%
Negative 46%
This means that voters aren’t going to be casting a vote for Republican candidates because they like the GOP. Actually, swing and Independent voters will have to hold their nose to vote for a Republican. The fact is that the GOP has done little to positively re-brand the Republican Party in a way that makes it attractive. This makes our candidates just as vulnerable as the Democrats. And we shouldn’t forget that no matter how many seats we win (or lose).
While many pundits think that the takeover of the US House is eminent, I am a bit more cautious. We are seeing a lot of data that shows Republicans competitive in Dem-held seats. But, with voters as upset with Republicans, we can’t take anything for granted. We still have to run a superior race. The seats that we are out-campaigned in, we will no doubt lose.
Tags: 2010 Election, Democratic Party, gallup, Joe Biden, Polling Analysis, Republican Party Posted in 2010 Elections, Barack Obama, Congressional, News Commentary, Uncategorized, polling | No Comments »
Wednesday, August 11th, 2010
GALLUP -
Presidents above 50% lose average of 14 House seats in midterm elections
by Jeffrey M. Jones
PRINCETON, NJ — Presidents who retain majority job approval from Americans at the time of midterm elections are much less likely to see their party suffer heavy seat losses than are those with sub-50% approval ratings. Since 1946, when presidents are above 50% approval, their party loses an average of 14 seats in the U.S. House in the midterm elections, compared with an average loss of 36 seats when presidents are below that mark.

The clear implication is that the Democrats are vulnerable to losing a significant number of House seats this fall with Barack Obama’s approval rating averaging 45% during the last two full weeks of Gallup Daily tracking. The Republicans would need to gain 40 House seats to retake majority control.
On a historical basis, the Democrats under Jimmy Carter suffered the slimmest seat loss of a party whose president was below 50% approval, losing 11 seats in the 1978 midterms. More recently, Bill Clinton in 1994 and George W. Bush in 2006 saw their parties lose enough seats in the House to turn party control over to the opposition party when they had less than majority approval.
The president’s party nearly always loses seats in midterm elections, regardless of how well the president is rated by the public. Since World War II, only Clinton in 1998 and Bush in 2002 saw their parties gain seats in a midterm. Both men had approval ratings above 60% at the time of those elections. However, the parties of the other three presidents with ratings above 60% (Eisenhower in 1954, Kennedy in 1962, and Reagan in 1986) lost seats.
In general, though, the more popular a president is, the fewer seats his party loses, as presidents with approval ratings above 60% have averaged just a three-seat loss.
Bottom Line
With the Democratic Party in control of the White House and Congress, and key predictors of midterm seat change — including presidential approval, congressional approval, and national satisfaction — below average historically, the Democrats are clearly fighting an uphill battle this midterm election year.
In its latest weekly update on midterm voting preferences, Gallup found more registered voters saying they would vote for the Republican candidate in their district than for the Democrat, though Democrats had better showings the prior two weeks.
As the midterm campaign kicks off in earnest after Labor Day, the Democratic Party will do its best to convince voters to keep it in the majority. It is unclear to what extent they will employ the president to help them make that case, though his ability to make a positive impact could be limited if his approval ratings continue to register below 50%.
Tags: Bill Clinton, Dwight Eisenhower, George Bush, George W. Bush, Jimmy Carter, John F Kennedy, Ronald Reagan Posted in 2010 Elections, Barack Obama, Congressional, Down Ballot | No Comments »
Monday, August 2nd, 2010
A new interactive map page from Gallup ranks states by party identification and ideology….

Posted in 2010 Elections, Barack Obama, Congressional, Issues, News Commentary, Presidential, Statewide, polling | No Comments »
Friday, July 23rd, 2010
A recent survey by Quinnipiac presents us with more evidence that Americans are beginning to sour on President Obama. Despite winning a number of key legislative victories, Americans clearly don’t want what Obama is selling. Now, they are losing confidence in his ability to deal with the most important issue - the economy:
Handling Economy
39% Approve (was 44% in May 2010)
56% Disapprove (was 50% in May 2010)
Policies Hurt Economy 36% (was 32% in May 2010)
Policies Help Economy 41% (was 45% in May 2010)
Made no Difference 19% (was 18% in May 2010)
Who do you trust to do a better job handling the economy?
Obama  41%
Republicans in Congress 42%
Unsure 17%
As a growing number of voters believe that Obama’s policies have actually hurt the economy, we are seeing a plurality choosing to trust a group (Republicans in Congress) that the public actually thinks less of than Obama to handle the fragile economy:
Republicans in Congress 36% favorable
Barack Obama 49% favorable
This is a disaster for Demcrats who were hoping that Obama could help them save their candidates in the upcoming fall elections. With each passing day, Obama appears to be more and more of a liability for Democrats across the nation. We are already hearing reports that Dem candidates in several swing districts are refusing to appear with the President at events.
Republicans seem to be ready to win big in November, but it certainly won’t be because our brand is good. It seems like we may win in spite of ourselves this fall, especially with more and more bad news coming out about the RNC.
Tags: 2010 Camapign, Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economic Policies, Economy, Obama Approval, Obama Economic Policies, Polling Analysis, Quinnipiac, Recession, Republicans in Congress, RNC Posted in 2010 Elections, Barack Obama, Congressional, News Commentary, polling | No Comments »
Friday, July 23rd, 2010
Gallup has released institution confidence results that show that Americans have very little confidence in Congress. In fact, it is the lowest point on record:

Despite being at the bottom of the list, Congress did not have the largest drop from last year. That honor belongs to “the presidency” who dropped 15 points from 51% confidence to 36% confidence in a single year. That is more than double the movement of any other institution on the list.

The drop in confidence partners with one of the lowest approval rates in the past thirty years means that most Americans maintain strongly negative feelings for Congress.

Tags: Confidence Ratings, Congressional Approval, Obama, Polling Analysis, Presidential Confidence Posted in 2010 Elections, Barack Obama, Congressional | No Comments »
Wednesday, July 21st, 2010
Gallup - President Obama averaged 47.3% job approval during his sixth quarter in office, spanning April 20-July 19 — his lowest quarterly average to date. Americans’ approval of Obama has declined at least slightly in each quarter of his presidency.

Â
The latest quarterly results are based on interviews with more than 45,000 U.S. adults as part of Gallup Daily tracking. During this period, Obama saw a high of 52% approval in his three-day rolling average in mid-May, and several times saw a new low of 44%, including in mid-July. His sixth quarter in office was a period of continuing economic difficulty in the United States and coincided with the beginning of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
Obama’s Sixth Quarter in Historical Perspective
The average presidential job approval rating across all presidents in Gallup’s trends since Franklin Roosevelt is 54%, about seven points above Obama’s sixth quarter average. Others with sixth quarter averages below the historical approval norm are Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, and Bill Clinton. Dwight Eisenhower, John Kennedy, Richard Nixon, and both George Bushes had sixth quarter ratings above the norm.

Elected presidents with sub-50% approval ratings in their sixth quarters in office — Carter, Reagan, and Clinton — tended to see more significant midterm congressional seat losses than other presidents. This was particularly true for Reagan and Clinton, whereas the loss of 11 Democratic seats in the 1978 midterm elections under Carter was not extraordinarily high.
The prospects for a turnaround in Obama’s approval rating over the next several months do not look bright, based on historical trends. Most elected presidents saw their approval ratings decline in their seventh quarters in office; only George H.W. Bush saw significant improvement, due to the rally in support for him after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in August 1990.

Tags: Obama Approval, Presidential Approval Rating Posted in Barack Obama, Presidential, polling | No Comments »
Monday, July 19th, 2010
Politico released a survey this morning that included an oversample of 227 “DC Elites.” This gives us a unique ability to see how the elites stack up against the American public (represented by 1,011 adults - geographically and demographically representative of the nation at large).
First, let’s examine the demographics of both populations to give perspective to the results:
Gender
General Population (GP): 48% Male - 52% Female
Washington DC Elites (DCE): 40% Male - 60% Female
Age
GP:
18-34:Â 34%
35-54:Â 41%
55-74:Â 25%
DCE:
18-34:Â 29%
35-54:Â 38%
55-74:Â 33%
Income
GP:
<$35,000:Â 41%
$35,000-$74,999:Â 40%
$75,000-$149,999:Â 16%
$150,000+:Â 3%
DCE:
<$35,000:Â 0%
$35,000-$74,999:Â 1%
$75,000-$149,999:Â 54%
$150,000+:Â 45%
Ethnicity
GP:
White:Â 74%
Black/AA:Â 12%
Asian:Â 4%
Hispanic:Â 6%
Native American:Â <1%
DCE:
White:Â 85%
Black/AA:Â 1%
Asian:Â 6%
Hispanic:Â 0%
Native American:Â 0%
Party Identification
GP:
Strong Dem: 14%
Lean Dem: 21%
Independent: 23%
Lean GOP: 18%
Strong GOP: 14%
DCE:
Strong Dem: 26%
Lean Dem: 25%
Independent: 19%
Lean GOP: 17%
Strong GOP:Â 9%
Overall, the DC Elite are older, richer, whiter and more Democratic than the general population. The elite also happen to be more female.
Now, let’s examine the opinions of both groups…
Direction of the Country?
Right Direction: 27% GP - 49% DCE
Wrong Track:Â 61% GP - 45% DCE
Direction of Economy?
Right Direction: 24% GP - 44% DCE
Wrong Track:Â 65% GP - 46% DCE
How has the economic downturn affected you?
More than most Americans: 27% GP - 6% DCE
Less then most Americans: 24% GP - 74% DCE
About the same as others:Â 47% GP - 20% DCE
Do you think the political system in DC is broken?
Yes, Broken:Â 72% GP - 64% DCE
No, not Broken:Â 15% GP - 31% DCE
Most Important Issue Facing Country?
Economy/Jobs:Â 87% GP - 86% DCE
Education:Â 67% GP - 59% DCE
Healthcare:Â 65% GP - 64% DCE
How Favorable are you of…
Barack Obama:Â 25% GP - 36% DCE
Sarah Palin:Â 14% GP - 3% DCE
Nancy Pelosi:Â 5% GP - 12% DCE
John Boehner:Â 4% GP - 1% DCE
Harry Reid:Â 3% GP - 5% DCE
If election were held today for Congress, would you vote…
Democratic Candidate:Â 32% GP - 53% DCE
Republican Candidate:Â 31% GP - 26% DCE
Clearly, the DC Elites are very Democratic leaning in regards to their view of the economy, direction of the country and even showing partiality to Democratic leaders in Washington over their Republican counterparts. The bottomline is that the DC Elite represent the party in power. And, for the moment, that party is the Democrats. Aside from being heavy with female respondents, I see no problem with the oversample’s representative nature.
While Elites are “a world apart,” according to the Politico, they are easily able to identify top issues shared by the general population. However, the Elites are much more optimistic about the state of the economy primarily because they have been among the least affected.
It is remarkable to see that a majority of Elites agree with the general population that “the political system in DC is broken.”
Tags: Democrats in Congress, Economy, Ethnicity, Generic Ballot, Harry Reid, Jobs, John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi, Obama, Party Identification, Political System, Politico, Polling Analysis, Republicans in Con, Sarah Palin, Washington DC Elites Posted in 2010 Elections, Barack Obama, Congressional, Issues, News Commentary, Presidential, polling | No Comments »
Wednesday, July 14th, 2010
Polls and anecdotal reports indicate heavy Democratic losses in November, but it isn’t because Americans have new found love for Republicans. In fact, Americans have the least confidence in Republicans in Congress to make the right decisions for the country’s future leaving both Obama and Democrats in Congress better equipped to deal with our problems. But, these same respondents say that they are more likely to vote for the Republican candidate in November.
What gives?!?
The bottomline is that Americans haven’t forgiven incumbent Republicans for a number of transgressions that allowed the Democrats to take control of Congress and the White House in the past four years. But, the key word here is “incumbent.” The nation is fatigued of incumbents, with only 25% of registered voters saying that they would re-elect their representative for Congress while 62% would “look around for someone else to vote for.” This means Republican incumbents are as much at risk as their Democratic counterparts. We have seen this vulnerability manifest itself through the defeat of a number of establishment-choice candidates in primaries to date. We have also noted that Republicans are more negative than Democrats about their own members in Congress, but are setting records for enthusiasm for the November election.
So, why are Republican voters excited about November if they are angry at their own members in Congress?
Bad memories of years past help keep the Republican brand negative, but the potential to vote for a non-incumbent Republican candidate is attractive - not only to the Republican base, but also to Independent/unaffiliated voters.
The Tea Party movement has also helped boost enthusiasm and focus on non-incumbent Republican candidates by helping ignite a renewed sense of fiscal conservatism that fell by the wayside during the 2000s. The Tea Party-fueled anger has been proven to be more of a frame of mind than an actual defection from the Republican party; however, this has helped oust or weaken moderate and establishment Republicans. At the center of the movement is a belief that the “rank and file” should be in control, not the party fat-cats. This sentiment hurts the Republican brand internally as well as taint a number of incumbent members by the behavior of the party at-large in previous years despite their own personal records.
The renewed interest by the Republican rank and file could help the Grand Old Party take back Congress. But whatever the outcome of November, I expect pressure for new leadership to be palpable. However, we have seen that change for change’s sake is not always the best choice.
Tags: Brand, Confidence in Democrats, Confidence in Obama, Confidence in Republicans, Democrat, Democrats in Congress, establishment candidate, GOP, Independent Voters, Insider candidate, Obama, Polling Analysis, Republican, Republicans in Congress, Tea Party, Unaffiliated voters, Voter Enthusiasm Posted in 2010 Elections, Barack Obama, Issues, News Commentary, polling | No Comments »
Wednesday, July 14th, 2010
See below an exerpt from Jonathan Allen and John Bresnahan of Politico
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi bashed White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs Tuesday night, even as the president’s top spokesman continued to backpedal from his assertion that Democrats could lose control of the House in the November election.
The fusillade from Pelosi and other Democrats at a closed-door meeting escalated an already fiery clash between the White House and its own party in Congress. During the tense evening meeting, the speaker grilled the top White House aide in attendance, senior legislative affairs staffer Dan Turton, about the impact of Gibbs’ comments.
“How could [Gibbs] know what is going on in our districts?” Pelosi told her members in the caucus meeting in the basement of the Capitol Tuesday night. “Some may weigh his words more than others. We have made our disagreement known to the White House.”
Then she turned to Turton and asked him to acknowledge that Gibbs’ comments had been damaging to the Democratic cause, Democratic insiders said. Gibbs was not in the room for this meeting.
Turton, responding to both Pelosi and accusations from Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.), said Gibbs was speaking off the cuff and not from prepared material during a controversial appearance on Meet the Press Sunday, sources said.
The outburst from House Democrats illustrates the pressure lawmakers are feeling from an impending election and the strain of the tension – and occasionally enmity— that has characterized relations between an increasingly unpopular president and a House majority facing the possibility of huge electoral losses.
Democratic lawmakers also tried to pin their woes on the White House, saying that control of the House might not be in play if the Obama administration had done a better job of messaging on the party’s agenda and accomplishments.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0710/39703.html#ixzz0td8zrA7M
Tags: Bill Pascrell, Dan Turton, Nancy Pelosi, Robert Gibbs Posted in 2010 Elections, Barack Obama, Congressional, Down Ballot | No Comments »
|